The Tipsy Professor

Four Ways to Nearly Die

An argument about what near-death is supposed to teach you, conducted across four separate opportunities to find out, and won by nobody except my parents, who weren't even there.

Everybody already agrees that a brush with death clarifies what matters. That agreement has cost nobody anything and changed nothing, which is how you can tell it is not really a belief. It is a thing we say at funerals and then drive home from, editing toward the exits.

I want to make the more annoying argument, which I am entitled to because I collected the data personally, four times, in ten days, against my will, and am writing this from a moving car in which the second driver — me — is still recovering his nerve: near-death does clarify what matters. That is precisely the problem. The clarity is real, it is specific, and it is almost entirely useless, because the thing it reveals is not the thing you have organised your life around, and the revelation does not survive contact with a Tuesday.This is the same structure as a smoke alarm. It is correct, it is loud, and within ninety seconds of it going quiet you have already decided it was probably the toast.

The honest ledger

Four brushes. Here they are with their denominators, which the story usually omits.

The brushHow closeWhat I told myself it meantWho I actually thought of
A current off Copacabanaone bad minuterespect the oceanmy parents
A dog’s teeth in Trancosoone interest-free loanbad luck, not stupiditymy parents
A skid on a night bendtyres, briefly, complainingslow downmy parents
Overtaking a truck at a truckno contact, both of us feeling the contactdo not do thatmy parents

The dog is the only one of the four I could not have prevented by simply being less of an idiot, which is the exact reason I resent it least — an interest-free loan the universe extends to your denial, repayable in four vaccine doses, two of them already in my arm and two still ahead of me, the last booked for a Geneva clinic I have not yet flown home to.The clinical term is incubation period. It is a generous name for the interval during which you are already wrong and do not yet know it — which, now that I write it down here in the passenger seat, is also a fair description of the several months preceding this drive.

Four different mechanisms. Four different lessons, each sensible, each filed. And underneath all four, the same name surfacing, uninvited, and it was not the name I had spent the year arranging my whole interior around.

I had assumed that if my life were genuinely threatened, the absence I’d been nursing is what would rise. It didn’t. Four times the water went cold and administrative and my mind reached past her entirely, to two people I have spent nine years loving at a distance and calling it later.

Where my own argument falls apart

The obvious next move is to say: then change. Call home. Say the things. Let the auditor’s finding become the new policy. Be a man reordered by the truck.

I do not believe this works cleanly, and here is where I lose the argument I came in with.

Because the auditor does not stay. That is the whole cruelty of the mechanism. In the moment, near-death has the authority of law: it walks straight past everything ornamental and puts one cold finger on the load-bearing wall and names it — family, and you have neglected it. But the finger is already lifting — I can feel it lifting even now, an hour down the road. The cortisol drains. And the ornamental things, which are ornamental precisely because they are loud and immediate and demanding, will flood right back into the space the truck cleared. I will predict it, from here, while the finding is still warm: within a week I will once again be spending 3 a.m. on the exact person my four separate near-deaths unanimously declined to think about. The verdict is true. I simply do not trust myself to keep it filed.

What the charge actually is

It is not that the lesson is false. It is that it is seasonal, and I had mistaken it for permanent.

The mind that nearly drowns is a different instrument from the mind that cannot sleep, and they do not share files. The first one knows, with total clarity, that the load-bearing wall is family and that the ache is ornamental. The second one knows, with equal conviction, the reverse. Both are me. Neither can send mail to the other. The auditor issues a true finding to an office that closes at dawn.I wrote two words at the top of this page about an hour ago, once we had both stopped trying to die: no more cortisol. I mean it. I already suspect I will honour it about as well as anyone honours a resolution made under the influence of nearly dying, which is to say: unevenly, and mostly by writing it down again.

The question was never whether the near-death told the truth. It did. The question is why the truth needs to keep being delivered — four times, at speed — and still cannot get itself filed somewhere the 3 a.m. mind will read it.

What I do about it

Not much, honestly, and I distrust anyone with a five-point programme for integrating their own mortality.

One thing only. I wrote the four of them down — the current, the teeth, the skid, the truck — and beside each one, the name that actually surfaced, in my own handwriting, so that on the nights the office is closed there is at least a note slid under the door. It does not carry the authority the truck carried. Nothing does. But it is a record of a finding I keep agreeing with and keep failing to feel, and the record is boring, and boring is the only register in which I have ever managed to tell myself the truth.

It was written at 13:48, in a moving car, which is not a dramatic hour or a dramatic place to be thinking about dying. That is the point. The dramatic hours lie. 13:48 just says what it says: still here, still on the road, adrenaline barely drained, the finger only just lifted — already trying, and already doubting I will manage, to file the thing correctly this time.

Four Ways to Nearly Die · The Tipsy Professor · https://thetipsyprofessor.com/essay/four-ways-to-nearly-die/